The Rank Magic Blog

February
27, 2006 ::: Buying text links seems to be the current rage in
Internet marketing. Is it good? Is it bad? Famed Internet marketing expert Jill
Whalen weighed in on the subject
in a
recent newsletter. As always, her observations are clear and accurate.
Here's some of what she had to say.
Buying text links. It's all the rage.
There's nothing wrong with purchasing an ad on a
website that links back to your website. Advertising your site is good.
Advertising it on popular sites where your target market hangs out is even
better. After all, the name of the game is to bring in targeted traffic. Your
advertisements on other people's sites are none of the search engines' business
and will not get your site banned or penalized. They will not hurt your site in
any way. How you market your site is completely up to you, and you don't need to
worry about the search engines if you decide to purchase text link ads.
So what's the big deal?
Here's where it gets tricky. A good portion of ads
that are bought on websites are not purchased for the targeted traffic they will
bring, but as an attempt to artificially inflate the link popularity of the site
being advertised. No big news to you, I'm sure, and no big news to the search
engines. Since having a popular site can often help with natural search engine
rankings, people have been looking for cheap and efficient ways to boost their
site's popularity for years.
Ya gotta do what ya gotta do -- but so do search engines.
To the search engines, a link is supposed to mean
that someone found a site useful and wanted to tell others about it. This may
very well have been true at one point in time many, many years ago. But today a
link could mean something completely different. A link might be a simple trade
between webmasters, or an ad, or even a vote *against* another site. With no way
for a search engine to really know the intent of a link, things have really
gotten complicated for them.
Ads used to have tracking links so that webmasters
could measure their return on investment; however, today's text linkers often
prefer to keep the tracking codes off because their web analytics software no
longer needs them. And besides, if you're going to buy an ad, you might as well
get the possible link popularity credit that comes with it. That's more likely
to happen with a plain old, stripped-down href link.
Unfortunately, this is wreaking havoc with
search engine algorithms. On the one hand, they know it's not their place to
tell people whether they should or should not advertise on other sites --
especially since most of the engines are advertising companies in their own
right. On the other hand, without any way to figure out which links are truly a
vote for a site, and which are simply a paid ad, the relevancy of the search
results for any given keyword phrase can be skewed towards those who are willing
to put their money where their mouth is.
The good news for search engines (and I guess
the bad news for link brokers) is that most text link ads and the sites that
sell them tend to leave noticeable "footprints" behind in the code. It would be
no trouble at all for a search engine to do a little digging into what the
latest footprints are, seek out all pages that have them, and simply not allow
them to pass any link popularity. This is not a penalty, mind you. It would just
be a way for the search engines to count only votes and not ads. Your ads would
still be worthwhile for the exposure and direct traffic they bring, but not for
providing you with link popularity. So although your site wouldn't technically
be penalized, its rankings could drop if it was dependent upon the link
popularity of paid links.
For those of you who don't believe the search
engines can or would do this, you obviously haven't been paying attention over
the years. What do you think every major update at Google has been about? They
haven't been specifically about purchased link ads, but they have been about
finding a subset of pages that all have similar characteristics and no longer
allowing them to count the way they used to count towards rankings. Which means
every page using the technique in question suddenly finds their rankings have
dropped like a rock.
It's not a matter of *if* this will happen with
paid text link ads, but *when*. It could be next week, next month, or next
year. Regardless of when the engines decide to lower the boom, you can bet we're
going to hear a lot of crying in the forums about it! For now, if you're buying
text link ads, or have been thinking about it, I wouldn't really worry about it.
Just make a mental note to yourself that whatever boost to your rankings they
may provide now could vanish at any time. It's no big deal if you're getting
real traffic from your ads, or if you're simply using them to jumpstart your SEO
campaign. It's going to be a problem only if your livelihood depends on buying
or selling text link ads to boost link popularity.
|
Here at Rank Magic, we encourage intelligent
ad buys, but discourage bulk buying of text ads.

New Ad Venues for Google
February
20, 2006 :::
Google is largely responsible for the biggest revolution in advertising
since Television when it popularized online ads that run next to search engine
results. Now, they want to bring its targeted-advertising system to old media:
radio, magazines and newspapers, even TV eventually. <the
story from USA Today>

February
13, 2006 ::: MSN has come up with a new plan to draw users away from
Google: free stuff. The company launched a contest on Monday that will give
users a chance to win prizes simply by using the service's search engine. Over
$1 million in prizes will be available during the months of February, March and
April. <more>
Not to be outdone, Yahoo confirmed that it's polling some Yahoo Mail users about
what they would want in exchange for making Yahoo their primary search engine.
<more>

February
9, 2006 ::: Some people watch the Super Bowl mostly for the
commercials. It's well know for previewing many brand new and innovative spots.
Well, Google has combined all of them onto one page so you can watch the ones
you want --- or even watch all of them one after another (takes about a half
hour). Some are really funny. Check it out at
video.google.com/superbowl.html

February
9, 2006 ::: This is a question many people grapple with when they
first realize they need help with their search engine rankings. The question was
well-posed and the answer was right on the money.
This is from
SEO guru Jill Whalen's High Rankings Newsletter issue 158.
How to Pick an SEO Company
Question: How does Company A, that is new to search engine
marketing, assess Company B to hire them to manage their SEO programs? I'm
seeing that there are companies making claims to put our company on the first
page of Google -- but there are black hat and white hat companies, companies
that make the SEO program so obvious that the site gets de-listed. It seems just
as complicated to pick a company as it is to actually optimize.
Jill's Answer: You would choose an SEO company the same
way you would assess any company you were going to purchase a service from.
Check out people who've used them before and get referrals and that sort of
thing. Find out how long they've been in business, and see if they'll tell you
exactly how it is they do their work.
What's their methodology? Do you understand it or is it all geek to you? You
can't expect them to give you the exact specifics of what needs to be done on
your site (until you've signed a contract and made a deposit), but if they say
the way they optimize is proprietary, then run like the wind!
At the very least, any professional SEO company should be doing extensive
keyword research, making site architecture recommendations, making copy
recommendations, and creating Title tags. If a company seems to mention *only*
Meta tags and submitting your site to search engines, but not the things that I
previously mentioned, then you'd be throwing away your money if you use them.
Even if you're paying them only a small amount of money, neither Meta tags nor
submitting to search engines will move your pages in the search listings. Those
alone aren't worth even a penny.
|
I couldn't have said it better myself! Needless to say, we welcome
inquiries about how we approach our SEO projects. We think you'll be happy you
asked.

February
8, 2006 ::: High Google rankings can bring lots of business to a web
site. As a result, it's tempting to try to fiddle with the system. Some
forms of search engine optimization are acceptable, but others aren't. One
"black hat" technique, the use of a so-called doorway page, has apparently
thrown BMW's German language web site out of Google's results altogether.
<See coverage in Forbes>
Matt Cutts, the Google engineer famous for his blog
discusses this incident along with the removal of a Ricoh web site for
similar transgressions.

February 7, 2006 :::
PubSub is something
entirely different. It is a tool for staying constantly updated on references to
a topic of continuing interest that appear in blogs, online discussions called
news groups, SEC filings and news releases.
In a normal search, you type in a term and the search engine tries to match it
against an index of Web sites. It's a one-time process. But in a PubSub search,
your search terms stay constant and are continuously matched against a changing
stream of data gleaned from PubSub's sources. When a match occurs, even if it's
months after you entered your search term, it pops up in PubSub and you're
notified. This seems similar to Google's News Alert feature, but not just
limited to news feeds.

February
6, 2006 ::: Kosmix
is a new health-related search engine.

February 5, 2006 ::: Google has announced a major update that
will affect the ranking of web pages in Google's index. In contrast to the usual
algorithm updates, this update could be much bigger because it changes the way
Google works behind the scenes. Google has given the update the name "Bigdaddy".
Google uses a network of data centers with different IP addresses to answer
search queries. These decentralized servers share the workload of indexing web
sites. The upcoming Bigdaddy update is not an algorithm update but a change in
Google's data center infrastructure. It contains new code for sorting and
examining web pages. According to Google's search engineer
Matt Cutts, the
update will be live in February or March.
Google is updating the data center infrastructure to handle potential spam
problems such as 302 redirections or
canonical URLs more efficiently. In addition, the new infrastructure will
allow Google to develop more advanced algorithms and larger databases.
Another reason for the new data center infrastructure is that Google wants to be
able to index different content types. Google is now testing a new search engine
spider that is based on the Mozilla browser.
The new spider should be able to index more than traditional search engine
spiders, possibly links within images, JavaScripts or Flash files.
How can you test how Bigdaddy will affect your rankings?
Some Google data centers that use the new Bigdaddy system are already online.
For example, if you go to 66.249.93.104 you can test Google's new data center.
Google even wants your feedback. Click the "Dissatisfied? Help us improve" link
at the bottom right of the result page. Enter your feedback and use the keyword
bigdaddy so that Google knows that your feedback is about the new data center.
It's hard to tell how the Bigdaddy update will affect your web page rankings. If
you have a spam free web site with good content and many incoming links, the
update should have a positive effect on your Google rankings.

February 4, 2006 ::: Some people apparently might add paint to
their rooftops to advertise on Google Maps, silly as it sounds.
The MIT Advertising Lab blog has a neat photo of a Target store with its logo
largely emblazoned on its roof.

February 3, 2006 ::: Many online advertisers are overpaying to
have pay per click links to their business on search engines like Google and
Yahoo, according to a study released recently.
<more>

February 1, 2006 ::: Google Inc. on Monday said has taken its
online news service out of beta, and has added a feature that automatically
recommends stories to subscribers of its personalized search offering.
<more>

|
February
2006
|
Comments?
If you'd like to
contribute to the blog with an opinion, observation or question, please
drop us an email |
Archives
Current
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
LAST YEAR ...
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
THE YEAR BEFORE ...
December, 2006
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
THE YEAR BEFORE THAT ...
December, 2005
November. 2005
October, 2005
September, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June,2005
May, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005 |
|