The Rank Magic Blog
Google Bombs Mostly Defused ... Or Are They?
February 28, 2007 ::: Google has announced
that they have defused most Google bombs via an algorithmic update. For most
sites, this should have no effect. But if you've been amused by Google bombs
(such as the George Bush Google
bomb on "miserable failure", you may enjoy an extensive
blog post by Scott Goodyear. He defines what a Google bomb is, what sites
may have to worry in case Google becomes more aggressive about defusing these
bombs, and some potential "SEO Karate" that sites may want to use if they've
been Google Bombed.

Plan Your SEO for the Long Haul
February 23, 2007 ::: In her latest ClickZ column,
Short- vs. Long-Term SEO Shari Thurow proposes that most SEO
firms can be divided into two groups – depending on
whether they employ short-term or long-term strategies. Short-term "algorithm
chasers" are fighting a losing battle, she says, trying to get the best results
at the moment and scrapping everything when an algorithm changes. Thurow
outlines the short-term pattern like this:
|
Short-Term SEO
Strategy
-
The client's search engine traffic drops
(sometimes a dramatic drop if there's a major algorithm change).
-
The client communicates dissatisfaction
to the SEO firm.
-
The SEO firm attempts to reanalyze the
algorithm.
-
Based on the so-called algorithm
analysis, the SEO firm implements changes.
-
The client waits for implementation to
take effect.
-
Lather, rinse, and repeat.
|
Instead of having a reactive strategy like that, Thurow suggests that SEO practitioners should instead take a
proactive approach, by building a keyword-focused, search-friendly,
user-friendly Web site. That strategy can also help increase conversions and
attract inbound links. She also points out:
|
The funny thing
about this long-term approach? Implemented correctly, a
keyword-focused, search-friendly, user-friendly Web site tends to
receive qualified search engine traffic over time in spite of all
algorithm changes and all new search engines that come onto the
horizon. Link development isn't a difficult process because people
genuinely want to link to easily accessible, unique content.
|
Here at Rank Magic, we have always followed
the long-term approach. In fact, the first web site we ever optimized (a tutor
for kids with learning disabilities) back in 1999 still ranks #1 in Google for
"NJ Tutoring" – and it hasn't been modified in at least 5
years.

Title Tag: Don't Overlook This Critical Item
February 19, 2007 ::: The title tag is one
of the most important factors in achieving high search engine rankings. The
title tag is in the HTML code of each of your web pages, and it appears not on
your web page anywhere, but in the title bar of your web browser: right next to
the Internet Explorer logo or the Firefox logo at the very top left of your
browser window.

Sometimes, just fixing the title tags of your pages can improve your rankings a
lot. We see this especially in web sites developed by novices. If you've created
your own web site, you may not have thought about the title tag. If that's the
case, your title tags may all be the same -- saying something like "Home Page"
or "New Page 1". Title tags like that will only help you if you sell "home
pages" or "new pages".
You need to have your keywords in your title tags -- different title tags for
every page because you should have different target keywords for every page. You
can include your company name on some or all of your title tags, but keep in
mind that the search engiens only read the first 10-12 words or 60-80
characters, so if your page is focusing on critical keywords, make sure they're
within the first 60-80 characters of your title tag
The words in your title tags show up as the headline for your listing in the
search engine results page (SERP), and changing them to be more appealing or
informative to potential customers may result in more clickthroughs as well as
higher rankings.

February 15, 2007 ::: Rae Hoffman, an SEO
consultant whose company is called
Sugarrae, has written
a pretty good introduction to the importance of links, oriented to small
business owners who might decide to try and build their link popularity
themselves. If you're considering doing that, her blog entry should help you
understand the basics. She wrote:
A while back I did a
post on what I considered to be the very basics of local small business website
marketing. Since it seems the basics were appreciated, I decided to do a post on
another basic I’m questioned about a lot … why a site needs links to rank (oh,
I’m dead serious).
This post isn’t aimed at professional webmasters or search marketers. This is
aimed at the person new to search engine optimization that needs a basic
understanding of why they need to develop links, though professionals may find
it useful for the new link developer or search marketing trainee.
It’s derived from a presentation I did to small business owners last year and I
thought others may find it useful. I’m a strong believer that link developers
need to know why they are developing links to be successful.
<Read the rest of the post here> |

February 12, 2007 ::: A search engine
professional started an interesting thread on Search Engine Watch, introducing
it like this:
"What are everyone's top 10 factors in search marketing to watch out for in
2007? And not
just marketing, but helping users find the correct content. This could range
from
continuing existing good practice, to something entirely new like video search."
He went on to itemize his top 10:
-
Content - quality content produced by people with
an expert knowledge in the field.
-
Keywording - identifying keywords for content and
links.
-
Site Architecture - from menus, to the way
sections on a site interlink with each other.
-
Rich Media - concentrating on utilizing video,
image and audio search.
-
Web 2.0 - trying to utilize blogs and forums more
to improve search.
-
Accessibiltiy - this is sort of covered by some of
the above, but ensuring a site is accessible not only is morally correct and
good from a user point of view, but will help improve search.
-
Inbound links to your site
-
Relevancy - ensuring everything is neat and
relevant across a site. Irrelevant links and content could be detrimental?
-
Popularity - the more visitors the better.
-
Constant re-evaluation and improvement based on
user stats and new industry knowledge.
|
I would accept most of that, but would
re-order the priorities:
-
Content
-
Accessible Navigation and Site Architecture
-
Intelligent Keyword Selection
-
Relevance
-
Effective Inbound Links
-
6-10 would be the rest.
What do you think? You can see what others
thinnk and ad your own opinions on the
Search Engine Watch Forum.

The Most Common Reason for Dropped Rankings: Duplication
February 8, 2007 ::: SEO consultants
complain that they repeatedly have to explain that using duplicate content
negatively affects search engine rankings. And rebuilding rankings after being
penalized for duplicate content isn't a quick and easy process. Ross Dunn, the
founder and CEO of StepForth Search Engine Placement Inc. in Victoria, British
Columbia has written
an article for Site Pro News that covers the bases.
Some people register multiple domain names and have the same web site available
at each of them. Well, there's a right way and a wrong way to do that, and
sadly most people do it the wrong way. Others copy content from other web sites
(sometimes even with copyright permission) but that may run afoul of search
engine duplicate content filters, too. And some poeple have web sites created by
"conetne management systems" that cater to a specific industry like real estate.
Many web sites created by those folks will have identical calculators and even
much of the same content as each other. How can you tell if that's a problem for
your web site? And what can you do about it?
Ross' article explains it all quite well.

Algorithm to reduce Googlebomb impact
February
5, 2007 ::: Googlebombs are attempts to influence the Google rankings
of a page for humorous or political intent. (See
a fuller description on Wikipedia.)A famous example was cited in our
August 2005 blog: a
search for the phrase "miserable failure" brought up the official White House
biography of George W. Bush as the first result. That's because so many people
had created links on their web pages that pointed to the President's biography
with link text that said "miserable failure". Since the technique doesn't only
work on Google, the more generic term for it is a "linkbomb". David Letterman
might call it a "stupid SEO trick".
Now, it seems that Google is trying to spoil the fun for those pranksters.
They've modified their algorithm to detect and disregard such Goglebombs. You
can read a good overview of this, including lots of blog responses on the
Google Operating System blog. If you prefer to get the information
straight from the horse's mouth, you can read Google's take on it in the
Official Google Webmaster Central Blog.

Senduit to Share Large Files Easily
February
2, 2007 ::: Sometimes it can be a challenge to send large files as
email attachments. Many mail servers place limits on the size of attachments
they will permit. Others will refuse certain file types, most notably
executables. And sometimes even if you zip up an executable file to get past
that barrier, the mail server may be wise to that trick and still forbid the
attachment.
Senduit to the rescue. Here's how it works:
navigate to Senduit,
find the file you want to share with someone, upload it, and then Senduit gives
you a URL where your file can be accessed - that link goes inactive after 30
minutes unless you tell Senduit to keep it active for longer. Give the URL to
the intended recipient and they can retrieve your file.

|
February
2007

|
Comments?
If you'd like to
contribute to the blog with an opinion, observation or question, please
drop us an email |
Archives
Current
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
LAST YEAR ...
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
THE YEAR BEFORE ...
December, 2006
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
THE YEAR BEFORE THAT ...
December, 2005
November. 2005
October, 2005
September, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June,2005
May, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005 |
|