
SEO Produces Higher Conversion Rates
July 24, 2006 ::: MarketingSherpa did a study of conversion rates.
Conversion Rate is the proportion of web sites visitors who order a product on an
e-commerce site or complete some other desired action on other sites, such as
filling out an inquiry form. Comparing organic search (SEO campaigns) against
paid search (PPC campaigns), they found
the following:
-
SEO had higher overall conversion rates than
paid search (4.2% versus 3.6%)
-
For e-commerce purchase campaigns, SEO had
higher conversion rates (4.1%) than paid search (3.8%)
-
Looking at delayed e-commerce/service purchase
campaigns, SEO also had higher conversion rates (6.3%) than PPC (4.2%)
In a related study by
WebSideStory
covering the October-December holiday buying season in 2005, the overall
search engine conversion rate for business to consumer (B2C) web sites was
2.3%. That was more than twice the conversion rates of banner ads, affiliate
marketing links, shopping search engines and other referring links (0.96%).

July 23, 2006 ::: Industry research shows that most e-commerce sites are not
well optimized for organic search engine rankings. A 2005 study by
OneupWeb revealed that
83% of Internet Retailer Magazine's top 100 websites fail to use basic search
engine optimization principles to gain high rankings.
The study went on to show that of the well-optimized web sites, 89% were found
on the first three pages of the search engine results for their respective
keyword queries, and 52% appeared on the first page.
By contrast, only 4% of the non-optimized pages did as well. The
implication is pretty clear.

2005 E-Commerce Sales 25% Greater than Previous Year
July 22, 2006 ::: The Department of Commerce
has estimated total e-commerce sales in 2005 at $86.3 billion, an increase of
25% over 2004. That compares with total retail sales increasing just 7% over
2004. e-commerce sales constitute 2.3% of total sales, and are estimated to
reach $139 billion annually by 2008.

Many
Retail Store Sales Driven By Search
July 20, 2006 ::: "The Role of Search in Consumer Buying" is a new study by
comScore, commissioned
by Google.
They examined the search behavior of 83 million Americans who conducted over 552
million searches within 11 product categories using one or more of the 24 top
search engines. Some interesting results:
-
25% purchased an item directly related to
their search query
-
37% completed their purchase online
-
63% completed their purchase in an off-line
retail store
Moral of the story: local retail stores
can no longer afford to ignore the impact of the Internet. No matter how
local your establishment, and no matter how narrow your market, customers
are looking for you and your products online. If they can't find you in the
search engines, which of your competitors do they find?
It's easy for you to test out.

July 18, 2006 ::: Flash movies are a great
way to add multimedia elements to a web site. Unfortunately, Flash cannot be
indexed by most search engines. For that reason, it is very difficult to get
high search engine rankings for Flash sites.
Even Google officially tells webmasters that it is difficult to get ranked with
Flash sites: "If fancy features such as JavaScript, cookies, session IDs,
frames, DHTML, or Flash keep you from seeing all of your site in a [simple] text
browser, then search engine spiders may have trouble crawling your site."
Although it is very difficult to get high rankings with Flash sites, it is not
impossible. The trick is that you don't have to optimize your web page content.
You have to optimize the links to your site.
<more here>

July
13, 2006 ::: In a blog entry at Search Engine Watch, it's reported
that a click fraud study that claims 14.6 percent of all clicks and $800 million
worth of fraudulent clicks were charged to advertisers.
The study conducted by Outsell Inc., a market researcher in Burlingame, seems to
have been a survey of "407 online advertisers representing a cross-section of
U.S. business."
<more from Search Engine Watch>

Click Fraud is Setting Records
July 8, 2006 ::: Click fraud has become so
large that it's setting records, and not in a good way.
"We've seen indications that the overall losses due to click fraud could equal
more than $1 billion" each year, according to a financial expert quoted in
Business Week. That figure is "larger than the total magnitude of credit card
fraud in the U.S.," according to Fair Isaac's director of product marketing, Kandathil Jacob.
Fair Isaac, a credit-scoring firm, is in a position to know,
since it analyzes some 85 percent of U.S. credit card transactions.

July 5, 2006 ::: It's happened to you.
You've searched for something on Google and several promising results appear.
You click on a link, but when you get to the site all you see are a few ads and
nothing even remotely close to what you searched for. So you go back to the
search results and try again, only it happens again and again until you finally
find a page with some decent content ... or frustration sets in and you give up
all together.
Why does this happen? How come in this day and age Google can't give you
the results you're looking for? A large part of the answer is the growing number
of made for AdSense (MFA) sites on the web today. MFA sites are designed for the
sole purpose of getting you to click on a Google AdSense advertisement.
When seeking link partners for our clients, we find a very large percentage of
sites with links to some of our clients' competitors are MFA sites. Those links
aren't helping our clients' competitors, but certainly add noise to our
link-finding efforts because we don't want to solicit links from them. They're
presenting an increasingly frustrating component to link building.
For a better understanding of the impact of MFA sites and the likelihood of
Google and others dealing with them, read Adam MacFarland's article from
Site Pro News.

July 3, 2006 ::: In a search engine forum,
someone asked about the value of links to their web site that were temporary in
nature. One response was this:
"Search engines look at how long a link has been in place.
Links that come and go don't count for much while links that stay in place
longer the better. Basically, when the search engines find the link that would
be considered day 1. If that link is still there on repeated crawls six months
or a year later then that link has earned some trust points with the algorithm."
You can read the whole thread here.

July 1, 2006 ::: A question we're
asked often is what impact it will have on rankings if a client changes their
domain name, or if they want to change the filenames of some of their pages.
Noted SEO guru Jill Whalen recently addressed the question very effectively.
Here's the question and Jill's answer from
High Rankings
Advisor:
Question
We are planning to rewrite our URLs so that they reflect our keywords. Our
current URL now looks like this:
http://www.oursite.com/ProductDetails.aspx_
InnerCategory_Outdoor20Accessories_ InnerCatalog_Accessories_InnerProduct_5015
The new URLs will instead look like this:
http://www.oursite.com/accessories/ outdoors/conetorch
We also plan to put a permanent 301 redirect from the old URLs to the new ones.
My question is, will this be enough or are there any other precautions we
have to take into consideration? Can we make the merger of all URLs at one time
or do we have to make a successive merger? These questions are from a search
engine point of view.
Answer
This seems to be one of the most frequently asked questions lately. There's a
common misconception that putting keywords in URLs is some sort of key to high
rankings, and it simply isn't true. If your current URLs are getting found,
spidered, and indexed by the search engines, changing them at this point will
cause you only pain. Lots of pain. Instead of helping those pages to be found,
it will hurt their chances of being found because you will be taking perfectly
good URLs that the search engines know about and changing them to brand-new ones
that have no history and no links.
The ages of your URLs, like domains in general, seems to have somewhat of an
aging factor related to them. I definitely notice that when I add a new page to
any of my sites, it can take the search engines a very long time to start to
rank it well in the search engines for the keyword phrases that relate to it. On
the other hand, if I'm just making edits to an existing page (and keeping its
URL the same), the search engines will rank it accordingly, and fairly quickly.
Even if keywords in URLs actually is something that might help rankings (and in
my opinion it is not), you'd still have to weigh the very slight benefit you'd
receive against the months of waiting for the search engines to 1) index the new
URLs, 2) start to follow and give credit to the 301-redirect, and 3) sort the
whole mess out.
I would highly recommend that you leave the URLs exactly as they are. If you
have some SEO company telling you to change them, you should be extremely
skeptical as to whether they really know what they're doing and whether they
understand the ramifications of what they're recommending. Sometimes I think
that some SEO companies just don't understand the elements that really help
rankings, so they fall back on the silly things like changing URLs, because it
is a lot of work and makes it look like they're actually doing something
important.
I have seen so many websites and uninformed webmasters get burned by this whole
situation. It gives them a good 3 months of nightmares while they lose all their
existing indexed URLs and rankings, and they never quite know if/when they'll
get them back with the new URLs.
I hope this helps to make you aware of the problems you may be creating if you
decide to go this route.
|